The Sunday of the Hoosier Prodigals

Today, the sixth Sunday of Pascha in the year 2014, we commemorate St. Mario the Pole, also called The Slowing Down, who contended annually in the arena with 32 fierce pagan charioteers before an innumerable host of boozy, bosomy infield babes, thus inciting many men to absent themselves from the Divine Liturgy and lesser ecclesial assemblies and to show themselves openly as double-minded and inconstant.

Verse: To the contest of The Slowing Down with his adversaries in India No Place did the prodigals make haste. Through their prayers, O Christ Our God, grant us, their older brothers, and they the prodigals (I guess – grumble, grumble), repentance and remission of sins.

* * * * *

The remarks made in this essay do not represent a true excerpt of the Synaxarion, read at every Matins. They are intended as a good laugh for those who’ve attended Matins enough to know the rhythms and word play. Well, and maybe a little chastening for men so keen on motor sport that their churches can’t field a choir on Memorial Day Sunday.

Some succinct standing advice on recurring themes.

Rites of Passage

Openly discussing celibacy is undesirable because marriage and sex are rites of passage. We’ve encountered people who have suggested that we just haven’t grown up, that we’re late bloomers, or that we haven’t explored our sexual potential. These people allege that in choosing celibacy, we are avoiding growing up and are dangerous because we encourage people to shake off adult forms of responsibility. We do acknowledge that sex has plays a role in many different cultural rites of passages, especially as it relates to various marriage customs around the world. However, we note that scholars and journalists who write on American culture frequently lament the lack of coming-of-age rituals for adults, especially as more and more college graduates find themselves struggling to find work and move back in with their parents. Amid this economic uncertainty, one might argue that marriage, and its requisite parts of entering into a consensual sexual relationship and founding an independent family life, seems to be the last stable form of marking the transition from child to adult.

For people discerning celibacy, especially outside of religious life, the emphasis on sex and marriage as essential rites of passage deprives them of the opportunity to explore celibacy as a meaningful way of life. Celibacy is often seen as a default option for the young, the weird, or the otherwise undesirable. According to most people we know, the only folks above a certain age who aren’t having sex are those who lack the coordination and the resources to ask for sex.

(Queering Celibacy amid Fixation on Sex, emphasis in original) The authors reflect on the ease with which we (generally) talk about sex but how very uncomfortable talk of celibacy seems to be. They suggest various reasons for that, but that one most arrested my attention.

It’s been too long since I thought about rites of passage. They are so nearly universal that it’s very WEIRD of us to lack them – if, indeed, we do lack them.

I thought I’d do some research on rites of passage, but a quick look suggests to me that it’s so huge a topic, that any research I did would be superficial, and anyone who thought me expert would be deluded.  So take the following, even more than usual, with the “not scholarly research” disclaimer. I’m not even going to use hyperlinks to distinguish from my musings what I actually saw in my very brief web overview.

It seems that in Catholicism, first Communion may be a rite of passage. Jewish boys famously have Bar Mitzvah and girls in some Jewish traditions have Bat Mitzvah.

Hmm. We Orthodox Christians commune infants as soon as they’re baptized. There’s no confirmation class subsequently. Kids are in the Liturgy, singing the hymns and hearing the homilies from infancy (in most Churches; a few have adopted a version of Sunday School, for various reasons, that have the kids absent for part of the Liturgy). Now the Orthodox Crowning (Wedding) service is a big deal, as is monastic tonsure. Maybe that’s why they’re the two (and only two) traditional adult paths to salvation, with no recognized non-monastic “in-between” (which, if I need to be explicit, would be at least sexually abstinent, whatever else it might be).

There seems to be an urge for some rite of passage. We’re fascinated by the exoticism of some rites we see. Google “rites of passage” and you’ll find lots of “trees,” little forest, though there are a couple of domains or organizations that seem to be devoted to the topic. German secularists and Unitarian Universalists have made up rites, and I gather they’re not alone in doing so.

The thought occurred to me that smoking to “look grown up” may have functioned as a rite of passage. Getting a driver’s licensed used to do that, but that’s such a “no big deal” today that some kids, especially in big cities, don’t bother, and it as never surrounded by ceremony. High school graduation certainly did as well: I know I graduated 6/10/67 even though I couldn’t begin to tell you where my diploma is. There was a ceremony.

Today, when smoking is déclassé and religion moribund over vast cultural swaths, perhaps declaring oneself sexually active (and making good on that declaration) marks being grownup.

My own experience blurs one dominant cultural rite. Many, many people look back at college with the kind of awe that suggests that moving into the dorm is adulthood. But I moved into a dorm at age 14, under no few illusions that I was really adult, and look back with that sort of awed fondness on high school. So college, which still isn’t universal, isn’t “our society’s” rite.

I’m not convinced that we can make up a rite of passage as secularists and UUs have tried, any more than we could “start a new tradition” as our Headmaster oxymoronically put it about some now long-forgotten innovation.

But I wonder, and at least for the duration of writing this worry, about what our ersatz substitutes may be, and how perverse they may be.

Some day, someone will look back, and see what today is so big that it’s invisible: either the rite we couldn’t see as rite, or how the lack of such a rite hurt us.

* * * * *

“The remarks made in this essay do not represent scholarly research. They are intended as topical stimulations for conversation among intelligent and informed people.” (Gerhart Niemeyer)

Some succinct standing advice on recurring themes.

Scandal

The celibate authors at A Queer Calling reflect on the ease with which people are “scandalized” by two females, when “people nearly always [can and do correctly] assume that [one] is a member of the LGBT community because of [her] physical appearance.” 

People have all sorts of advice: we should not refer to ourselves as a couple and instead choose the more neutral language of friend or roommate, we should avoid describing ourselves as LGBT, we should constantly stress our commitment to celibacy, etc. We take significant time to reflect on how we’re being received by other people even as we simply try to live our lives. We do not pretend for an instant that we’re above having our way of life challenged, but we often wonder if, in a number of situations, people allege scandal rather than inviting conversations about how we’ve offended their sensibilities.

We can, and do, appreciate that these concerns have some merit when considered exclusively against the backdrop of a Church besieged by the culture wars. Unfortunately, the emphasis many churches place on the current political and social climate frames the conversation in terms of LGBT issues rather than LGBT people. Focusing on the culture wars places all the responsibility on LGBT people to address the fears of cisgender, heterosexual people. When a person perceives himself or herself on the “right” side, that individual can fall into a pattern of avoiding questions about his or her own discomfort. It seems to us that many cisgender, heterosexual Christians think they deserve a free pass on these questions because they aren’t actively doing anything that violates their sense of orthodoxy.

(Hyperlinks added)

Then Rod Dreher, prompted by her scatological rantgets a little overwrought (it seems to me) about a homeschooled girl’s embarrassment at being challenged at her homeschool prom about the length of her skirt:

I absolutely agree that if what Clare reports is how it went down, that she was humiliated, and treated disgracefully all around. She is owed a public apology. One of the infuriating things about this episode is that this treatment has probably alienated Clare from religion for a long time to come. I am all for modesty, but this is ugly stuff. The essay appears on her sister Hannah Ettinger’s website, in which the sister describes herself as a survivor of fundamentalist Christian homeschooling.

I know that people who hate homeschooling think we’re all like this. We’re not, not by a long shot. But this kind of thought and behavior does exist within religious homeschooling circles, and when we see it, we should have no hesitation to criticize it.

The common thread is people scandalized by their own imaginations. “These women may be a sleeper cell among us, feigning piety while doing raunchy things together at home and just waiting to attack our historic stance on sexuality.” “That girl is trying to inflame boys sexually even if she’s in technical compliance with our ‘fingertip length’ rule.”

If you read Clare’s rant, you’ll see that she’s scandalized, too (“I only got kicked out of the prom because the dads got as turned on as the boys”).

Perhaps even Rod (“People are going to think we homeschoolers are all like the folks who kicked Clare out of the prom”). I know that feeling, as I’ve frequently blogged, Tweeted, and otherwise disclaimed that Christians are all like some whack-job out their getting his 15 seconds of fame.

In any event, the cases seemed linked, and here, at least preliminarily and most superficially, is the link I see: someone is using “I’m scandalized” as a heckler’s veto. “It’s your job not to offend or arouse me, and if I’m offended, or aroused, by definition your words or actions were disorderly conduct. Away with you!”

”Shut[/cover] up’, he explained.”

Is this fundamentally different from the campus speech codes and other “political correctness” conservative Christians (notable among the easily scandalized) lament, or for the Muslim cultures that still cover women in Burkas so men won’t lust quite so much?

* * * * *

“The remarks made in this essay do not represent scholarly research. They are intended as topical stimulations for conversation among intelligent and informed people.” (Gerhart Niemeyer)

Some succinct standing advice on recurring themes.