Michael Gerson badly misrepresents Andrew Walker’s explanation for why many Evangelicals support Trump:
Walker is making the following claim: If you think abortion is a matter of life or death, then you must support whoever opposes it most vigorously, even if he or she is an immoral lout.
That is a maliciously bad misreading. Walker’s claim — and I read him attentively but critically — is far more like
that Trump opponents need to understand that because most of his fellow-Evangelicals think abortion is a matter of life or death, many of them have ended up uneasily supporting Trump, who opposes it while Democrats increasingly and defiantly support it and ban opponents from their ranks.
Walker said nothing about Trump votes actually being a moral imperative, but his premise is that it can feel like one. His column wasn’t even an argument for voting for Trump. It was a description of why some do. Thatt’s even plain from his title: Understanding Why Religious Conservatives Would Vote for Trump, not Why Serious Abortion Opponents Must Vote for Trump.
Remarkably, though, the rest of Gerson’s column explains lucidly, in five points (only the first of which is totally vitiated by what Walker actually explained), why supporting Trump is not a moral imperative for those who oppose abortion.
I even join Gerson in this:
I think Walker significantly (and strategically) overestimates the amount of moral angst amongst evangelical Trump supporters.
But then, I may agree with that just because of how both the press and Trump have treated Evangelicals as ipso facto Trumpista.
Anyone who thinks there’s a moral imperative to vote for Trump on anti-abortion grounds should read Gerson.
* * * * *
How small, of all that human hearts endure, that part which laws or kings can cause or cure.
I appreciate Donald Trump’s judicial appointments and a few other things he has done, but I’m utterly opposed to allowing that hateful, unstable and completely self-serving man to serve as President. Maybe by saying it here, I’ll feel less compelled to fault his multiple daily outrages — mere corroboration of his dark soul and tormented mind — in the body of the blog.